Green City Journal

The Pennsylvania State Senate voted 50-0 to pass an amendment to Act 71 that provides for the unelected Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) in Harrisburg to preside over all zoning and inspection issues for the two casinos the law mandates must be located in Philadelphia. What does this mean for Philadelphia? In addition to the city losing the right to enforce city zoning and safety codes, this amendment also includes language that gives the PGCB pre-emption rights not only over properties where casinos will be sited, but also to property "adjoining, including connection by a pedestrian walkway, bridge or easement, to the land-based location of the licensed facility", which means that the PGCB can legally grab the entire riverfront, piece by adjacent piece, if it so desires. Other bad news for the city include provisions that allow for an increase in the allowable casino floor area, so sites with a 400,000 sq. ft. footprint could build in, by building up, 4.8 million sq. ft. of floor space, and a reduction of the parking spots required at each site, which will place the additional burden on the city. Casinos will be allowed to hook up to city utilities without being charged a fee and will be given riparian rights to the riverfront by the state.

Here is an action alert from Hallwatch and NABR:
Senator Vincent Fumo is pushing an amendment to the Gaming Act that would take away the City's right to set and enforce zoning and safety rules on casinos. Fumo's amendment would also strip residents of their right to be heard on the design and operation of the casinos at a zoning hearing.